Radio Interviews
Al Rantel: (click, 18 min.)KABC AM, Los Angeles, CA 1/27/09
Bob Davis: (click, 40 min.)KSTP AM, St. Paul, MN 1/21/09
Jeff Whitaker: (click, 30 min.)
WOND AM, Atlantic City,NJ 1/14/09
Diane Jones: (click, 20 min.)
KLPW AM, St. Louis 12/3/08
More Below:
Doctor Stan: (click, 54 min. Go to 11/25) Radio Liberty, Monterey, CA 11/18, 11/24, 11/25
Mike McConnell: (click, 12 m.)
WLW AM, Cincinnatti, OH 10/6/08: Hidden Carbon Tax in Bail Out Leg
Fred Honsberger:(click, 12 min.)
KDKA AM, Pittsburgh 11/13/08
Don Weeks:(click, 12 min.)
WGY AM, Albany 9/24/08
Glen Meakem:(click, 21 min.)
104.7 FM, Pittsburgh 7/20/08
Discusses how book proves NIPCC is correct
John Corby: (click, 19 min.)
WTVN AM, Columbus, OH 9/25/08
Steel on Steel:(click, 30 min.)
IRN USA Haden, ID 9/13/08
Troy Neff: (click, 22 min.)
WCWA AM, Toledo, OH 9/23/08
Jerry Bowyer:(click, 11 min.)
KDKA AM, Pittsburgh 8./13/08
Tom Martino:(click 29 min.)
KNOW AM, Denver 9/08/08
Brad Davis Show
WDRC AM, Bloomfield, CT 9/16/08
John and Ken Show
KFI AM Los Angeles 9/17/08
Don White
KGY AM, Olympia, WA 10/6/08
Lean Techniques, LLC, © 2008
The evidence is in. Before we go bankrupt, read lt’s the Sun, Not Your SUV and make up your own mind.
This book is an excellent presentation of the truth about the
changes in temperature over the past 125 years. Increases
in solar activity along with reduction of cloud coverage and thus
Earth albedo (reflectivity) are the primary reason temperatures
have increased. Greenhouse gases are to a lesser extent
involved in the temperature changes. This book brings afresh
new set of information that provides the undeniable truth that the
IPCC report’s focus upon Greenhouse Gases is fatally flawed. It
also puts to rest as to whether there is any need for action on
this overly politicized issue.
- From the Foreword by Peter Dietze, 2001 IPCC Reviewer
Adapted from: http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/353.htm
Global temperatures have increased since 1960, up on average by 0.6° C in 1998. Temperatures have declined for the last decade by about 40%. New data show that solar impacts have increased by the same amount and follow the zigzags in temperature from 1935 to1970 and this last decade's decline. The report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says that, based upon computer models, increased energy absorption by CO2 and other “greenhouse gases” (GHG) are overwhelmingly the basis for temperature increases.
But zigzag increases in global temperatures do not track with minor straight line increased energy absorption by GHG. Rather, such increases follow closely the major zigzag changes in solar impacts emanating from our sun, no different from the past millions of years as has been supported by multiple climatologists and other scientists. In short, if GHG play a role, it is minor in the 0.26% warming since 1880. The sun is responsible for the primary change, and political fixes such as envisaged in the Kyoto Treaty will not change global temperatures measurably but will mean a drastic decrease in worldwide output of goods, with calamitous effects on millions of people who are ill-prepared to suffer immense decreases in their standards of living.
John Zyrkowski begins with the irrefutable, uncontested raw data available from governmental sources on temperature fluctuations, solar impacts of radiation and magnetic flux, and CO2 absorption rates. He then uses Excel functions to demonstrate that the IPCC report used by proponents of the human cause of global warming is fatally flowed. The data doesn’t provide the answer the IPCC said it would. The worst case increase from GHG is 0.45° C.
About the author: John Zyrkowski is president of Lean Techniques, LLC and has served as Vice President of Planning and International Engineering for the Clark Equipment Company, Inc. He has personally managed five turn-arounds using his expertise in the Toyota Production System: process engineering and team techniques. He advises over 150 top manufacturing managers on implementing world- class performance and design standards to become globally competitive from a U.S. cost base. He wrote a column for InMFG magazine and has been featured on the front cover of IMPO magazine.
John has also lived the way that the Global Warming community would envision for humanity as a Peace Corp Volunteer in Guatemala. He road a horse, plowed fields with oxen and a tree branch, and buried young children who died of starvation. More importantly, everyone who lived there is trying to come to the U.S.
The Foreword: Dipl-Ing. Peter Dietze, independent energy advisor and scientific climate and carbon modeler, official IPCC reviewer, Bavaria, Germany. (From U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works website:) http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
For You: Become A Fully Informed
Participant in the Climate Change
Discussion.
Become an amateur climate scientist able to participate
at science conferences with the confidence of having scientific
proof and able to use the language of climate change PhDs. This discussion is very critical to the future. Becoming knowledgeable about the science behind climate change will permit you to make
fully informed choices about policy decisions that your government officials are preparing to make that might be damaging to you and your community.
This book provides an in-depth but easily understood proof of all the key science of climate change. It explains each element in detail including examples and links to free websites that contain regularly updated data. By reading and following the examples in this book,
you will be able to replicate this climate model and understand the complex issues of this important scientific discussion. You will be
able to evaluate the differing views presented by scientists in their
own terms and weigh the importance of their results.
The examples will also prove to you that the Sun is the primary influence on the changes in temperature over the past 125 years.
You will also discover for yourself that the “greenhouse gases” have,
at best, a secondary role that will in the worst case have minor impacts upon global temperatures. With recently released data,
you will understand that almost one and a half to three times more irradiative energy to change temperature is available from the sun
than from “greenhouse gases”.
By following the examples and using your own calculations on your home computer, the limits of the impacts of these overly vilified
gases will become apparent to you. You will be able to understand
the scientific misjudgments made by those climate scientists that present dire forecasts regarding carbon dioxide and global warming. As you read the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, you will also recognize where the scientists ignored key science facts and overstated negative impacts with assumptions that are difficult to demonstrate from measurements. As we go to press, many of these supporting scientists are reversing their positions on these assumptions.
You will assure yourself that the chart on the left is a correct representation of the worst case forecast of temperature, not the dire forecasts of the Global Warming community.
Other relevent sites:
Total Solar Irradiance from ACRIM (1979 to 2007)
Total Solar Irradiance from SORCE (2003 to Present)
Earth's Heat Aids Greenland Ice Melt: Dr. Ralph von Fresse, Ohio State Univ. reports that "another reason why Greenland's ice is melting: a thin spot in the earth's crust is enabling underground magma to heat the ice."
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/hotgreen.htm
Three Proofs It's The Sun:
Atmospheric Temperature, Seas, & Ocean Heat Declines:
Updating the book's formulas will also permit you to predict the temperature the rise to 1998 and the 75% decline in 2008-9 from a base of 1880-1920 using Solar Forces only! (above) These declines are predicted by Solar Forces only and also predict that today's thermal expansion of the oceans has declined from the peak in 2003. More importantly, the Solar Forces only predict that sea level mass has changed about an inch since 1992, peaking in Dec, 2005 and declining since then according to satellite data from the Jet Propulsion Laboratories. (below) The Global Warming models only increase 264% higher than actual temperture changes when forecast from a base of 1880 to 1960 to today.
And, the current Global (North plus South Pole) ice caps have not changed much since 1979 and are returning to "normal" (Below).
Glacial melt for Antarctica, Greenland, and Alaska is measured in tens of mm per year since 1962, or 0.3 inches since 1992 and about 37% of the mass sea level change. It is easy to understand why Global Warming scientists have retracted a Nature Geoscience article that forecast New York flooding with this actual well known data.
You will be able to understand why the GW community could not forecast the temperature declines since 1998 and that the theory would predict 265% higher temperatures than those experienced today if forecast from 1960 as shown above. As a result, the GW community has just "discovered" ocean currents that will lower temperatures for 10 years before skyrocketing temperatures destroy the world. Additionally, you will understand why some science magazines only refer to the error prone NOAA GISS temperature record and denie the declining NOAA's Land-Ocean Index, British Hadley, and the NASA MSU satellite. These same sources do not report the decline in sea levels.
Honors for Dipl-Ing. Peter Dietze:
His original 1988 CO2 absorption model has withstood the test of time while the IPCC models have constantly been adjusted down from the inconceivably high levels. He wrote the foreword for this book and is featured in www.john-daly.com.
Dipl-Ing Dietze's model is a simple half life model based upon actual global emissions of CO2. It has been accurate since then as shown below and the formulas were used in the book. The mid-level models for the 2001 IPCC report are substantially higher than the actual changes in CO2 PPM, exceeding the actual levels by 11 years within 3 years of publication, and 17 years within 7 years (Chart 7.12 in the book)!
What a miss! And congratulations Dipl-Ing. Dietze for being right on!
